<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: Review: The Catcher in the Rye</title> <atom:link href="http://catchwa.org/2008/10/review-the-catcher-in-the-rye/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://catchwa.org/2008/10/review-the-catcher-in-the-rye/</link> <description>Now accepting bribes, enquire within</description> <lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Jan 2012 01:39:52 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator> <item><title>By: the other, other sam</title><link>http://catchwa.org/2008/10/review-the-catcher-in-the-rye/comment-page-1/#comment-2063</link> <dc:creator>the other, other sam</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 07 Oct 2008 09:35:41 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://catchwa.org/?p=549#comment-2063</guid> <description>YEEEAAAAAAHHHH  BOYIIIIIEEEEEEE!</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>YEEEAAAAAAHHHH  BOYIIIIIEEEEEEE!</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Andrew</title><link>http://catchwa.org/2008/10/review-the-catcher-in-the-rye/comment-page-1/#comment-2061</link> <dc:creator>Andrew</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 07 Oct 2008 07:54:04 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://catchwa.org/?p=549#comment-2061</guid> <description>@franzy: very true about the historical context. Too much HBO has de-sensitised me *cries*
@the other, other sam: I think Public Enemy said it the best: Don&#039;t, don&#039;t, don&#039;t, don&#039;t, don&#039;t believe the hype.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@franzy: very true about the historical context. Too much HBO has de-sensitised me *cries*</p><p>@the other, other sam: I think Public Enemy said it the best: Don&#8217;t, don&#8217;t, don&#8217;t, don&#8217;t, don&#8217;t believe the hype.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: the other, other sam</title><link>http://catchwa.org/2008/10/review-the-catcher-in-the-rye/comment-page-1/#comment-2058</link> <dc:creator>the other, other sam</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 07 Oct 2008 04:50:50 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://catchwa.org/?p=549#comment-2058</guid> <description>Brocky, I agree whole-heartedly with you.
In fact, I will gladly hold Holden&#039;s arms behind his back while you bitch-slap him upside the head.
Sometimes I wonder what makes (or who decides) something worthy of being a &quot;classic&quot;?  For example; I recently had the fortune of seeing the Venus de Milo in the &quot;flesh&quot; at the Louvre.  Goddess of Love &amp; Beauty huh?  More like goddess of Upsizing &amp; Salad-dodging!
Controversial?  Maybe.  But I&#039;ve seen Forestville-Men&#039;s-Hockey Umpires with more feminine figures...</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Brocky, I agree whole-heartedly with you.<br
/> In fact, I will gladly hold Holden&#8217;s arms behind his back while you bitch-slap him upside the head.</p><p>Sometimes I wonder what makes (or who decides) something worthy of being a &#8220;classic&#8221;?  For example; I recently had the fortune of seeing the Venus de Milo in the &#8220;flesh&#8221; at the Louvre.  Goddess of Love &amp; Beauty huh?  More like goddess of Upsizing &amp; Salad-dodging!</p><p>Controversial?  Maybe.  But I&#8217;ve seen Forestville-Men&#8217;s-Hockey Umpires with more feminine figures&#8230;</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: franzy</title><link>http://catchwa.org/2008/10/review-the-catcher-in-the-rye/comment-page-1/#comment-2053</link> <dc:creator>franzy</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 06 Oct 2008 23:55:39 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://catchwa.org/?p=549#comment-2053</guid> <description>Dude! That&#039;s one of my favourite books!
But I agree with everything you say about it. Not a lot happens. Maybe think of it in its historical context, which was that, at this stage in American life, teenagers didn&#039;t exist yet. You were a child, then at school, then you were an adult. Responsibility. Marriage. War. No chance to fluff around wondering who you were or what you wanted to do with yourself. Certainly no thinking about sex and drinking. This book was BANNED for obscenity.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dude! That&#8217;s one of my favourite books!<br
/> But I agree with everything you say about it. Not a lot happens. Maybe think of it in its historical context, which was that, at this stage in American life, teenagers didn&#8217;t exist yet. You were a child, then at school, then you were an adult. Responsibility. Marriage. War. No chance to fluff around wondering who you were or what you wanted to do with yourself. Certainly no thinking about sex and drinking. This book was BANNED for obscenity.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
